• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • DMCA
  • Blog

Davis Network Advertising

Success is in our D-N-A

Prosperity Marketing System

  • Home
  • About
  • News
  • Mobile
  • Resources
  • Contact Page
You are here: Home / News / Sesame Street’s Controversial Early Years – JSTOR Daily

Sesame Street’s Controversial Early Years – JSTOR Daily

April 7, 2017 by davis

It swept through social media like wildfire—a viral video showing Elmo getting laid off. The video was in response to President Trump’s new budget, which calls for defunding the Corporation for Public Broadcasting—better known as the home of Sesame Street.

Among all that uproar, it’s easy to forget the show’s original purpose: to use TV to deliver research-based educational techniques and prepare low-income kids for school. Interestingly, the early days of Big Bird and Oscar the Grouch were not always so sunny.

The show set the bar for a new kind of public television.

In 1969, just a few months before the first Sesame Street aired, John W. Macy, Jr. wrote an investigation of how public broadcasting might better serve American viewers. “This program is directed at teaching pre-schoolers letters of the alphabet and numbers by using the commercial advertising techniques of animation, jingles, and so forth,” he wrote. Macy viewed shows like Sesame Street as a way to reach out to kids without letting them know they were being taught—and to address “the racial problem” by promoting understanding across color lines.

But how best to measure if the show met its own goal? In 1971, Herbert A. Sprigle had a solution: compare kids exposed to the show with kids who weren’t and evaluate their school readiness. He found that children who watched the show were still at a disadvantage compared to their peers—and that those gaps “increased as a result of Sesame Street.” Sprigle called the show “a poorly conceived, poorly developed, and poorly presented educational program” and said that it could never fulfill its own expectations. (It’s worth noting that Sprigle ran a competing school readiness program and may have viewed the show as a threat.)

Educational Testing Service data from 1971 provided researchers with a glowing review of Sesame Street, but as Martin Schiff reported, others begged to differ. One study found that the show didn’t narrow educational gaps or affect children much at all, and that children in affluent homes seemed to gain more from the show than poorer ones. Another found that Mr. Rogers’ Neighborhood affected kids more positively than Sesame Street and that the show only increased cooperation in children with low baseline scores for social behavior. Yet another claimed that the show exposed children to undesirable behavior and aggression through its monsters—and that kids from disadvantaged backgrounds might be getting aggressive messages in addition to their everyday frustrations in school.

Clearly, academics responded to the show with mixed reviews. But one thing was for sure: As Joan D. Tierney noted in 1971, the show set the bar for a new kind of public television, pushing the barriers of what TV might be able to accomplish. “If such a fresh start is possible in an established medium,” she wrote, “then perhaps a fresh look should be taken at how vital learning is handled in the classroom.” Decades later, it’s hard to remember a world without Sesame Street—or recall just how controversial it was in its early years.


JSTOR Citations

Public Broadcasting: A Medium in Search of Solutions

By: John W. Macy, Jr.

Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 34, No. 3, Communications: Part 2 (Summer, 1969), pp. 636-649

Duke University School of Law

Can Poverty Children Live on “Sesame Street?”

By: Herbert A. Sprigle

Young Children, Vol. 26, No. 4 (March 1971), pp. 202-217

National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)

The Educational Failure of Community Control in Inner-City New York

By: Martin Schiff

The Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 57, No. 6 (Feb., 1976), pp. 375-378

Phi Delta Kappa International

The Influence of “Sesame Street” and “Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood” on Children’s Social Behavior in the Preschool

By: Brian Coates, H. Ellison Pusser and Irene Goodman

Child Development , Vol. 47, No. 1 (Mar., 1976), pp. 138-144

Wiley on behalf of the Society for Research in Child Development

Sesame Street: Magic or Malevolence?

By: ANNE R. RATLIFF and RICHARD G. RATLIFF

Young Children, Vol. 27, No. 4 (April 1972), pp. 199-204

National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)

The Miracle on Sesame Street

By: Joan D. Tierney

The Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 52, No. 5 (Jan., 1971), pp. 296-298

Phi Delta Kappa International

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)

Related

This post brought to you by https://daily.jstor.org/sesame-streets-controversial-early-years/

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar

Be the most informed person in your circle

Recent Posts

  • The F8 of Digital Advertising Sits with Fb and Google – Which-50 (website)
  • Why Sports Will Play a Greater Role in Fox’s Upfront Pitch
  • Google turns to artists to mold Assistant into an amiable companion
  • “Alexa, how can my brand shine in the age of ask”
  • Twitter amplifies branding opportunities in Periscope broadcasts

Archives

  • April 2017 (140)
  • March 2017 (15)
  • February 2017 (11)
  • January 2017 (5)
  • December 2016 (1)
  • September 2016 (1)
  • April 2016 (1)
  • March 2016 (1)
  • February 2016 (1)
  • October 2015 (1)
  • September 2015 (1)
  • June 2015 (1)
  • May 2015 (2)
  • April 2015 (3)

Footer

RSS Subscribe to our news feed…

  • The F8 of Digital Advertising Sits with Fb and Google – Which-50 (website)
  • Why Sports Will Play a Greater Role in Fox’s Upfront Pitch

Pages

  • About
  • Archive Page
  • Blog
  • Contact Page
  • DMCA
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • DMCA
  • Blog

Tags

amazon apple awards B2B B2C bitmoji branding campaigns chatbot marketing chatbots digital advertising direct response e-commerce facebook google influencer marketing Interview Mobile mobile app mobile video music non-profit PR regulations search technology snapchat sports TV twitter viral video

Categories

  • Mobile (54)
  • News (132)

#1 Tool for 2017

Prosperity Marketing System

Be successful by copying what we are doing in our own business [Earn money before you spend money]!

Copyright © 2021 · News Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in